This page explains what sits behind the outcome claims, testimonials and statistics referenced across Royal Medical Pathways — what is regulator-sourced data, what is aggregated from our own candidates, and how to request verification.
1. Regulator-Published Statistics
Pass-rate and exam-format figures attributed to a specific regulator (e.g. the GMC, Royal Colleges, AVMA, RCVS) should be traceable to that regulator's own published bulletins or candidate reports. Where we cite a figure, we link to the official source; if a page cites a statistic without a source link, treat it as unverified and let us know so we can fix it.
2. Candidate Testimonials
Testimonials on this site are drawn from candidates who have used our services. We are in the process of attaching verifiable proof — for example, screenshots of candidate correspondence — to testimonials as they are collected and reviewed.
Verification evidence (e.g. candidate correspondence screenshot) to be added here.
3. Aggregate Metrics (e.g. "98% Success Rate", "26,000+ Candidates")
Headline metrics used in our marketing describe our own internal candidate records. We are documenting the underlying methodology — what counts as a "success," the time window measured, and how the candidate count is derived — so this section can be filled in with that methodology and kept current as it changes.
4. Requesting Verification
If you would like more detail on the evidence behind a specific claim on this site, contact Support@royalmedicalpathways.com with the page URL and the claim in question.